Fig 4 Aortogram performed post stent graft placement demonstrates good flow across the graft with disappearance of collaterals. The inferior mesenteric artery was successfully spared, with antegrade flow in it.
Video 6 Post stent graft placement angiography demonstrates adequate luminal gain with flow across the graft and successful sparing of inferior mesenteric artery.
Management of Infrarenal Aortic Occlusion
Infrarenal aortic occlusion represents an advanced manifestation of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), most commonly attributed to progressive atherosclerosis. Patients typically present with a spectrum of debilitating symptoms, including severe claudication, rest pain, tissue loss, or acute-on-chronic limb ischemia. Historically, open surgical reconstruction—specifically aortobifemoral bypass—has been regarded as the gold standard, providing durable five-year primary patency rates of approximately 80–90% (7,8). However, this invasive approach carries significant perioperative morbidity and mortality risks, particularly for elderly patients and those with multiple comorbidities.
The Evolution of Endovascular Therapy
With iterative advancements in endovascular techniques, high-resolution imaging, and device technology, minimally invasive approaches have gained widespread acceptance for managing complex AIOD. While the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) guidelines initially recommended open surgery for extensive TASC C and D lesions (9), accumulating evidence demonstrates that endovascular therapy can be performed safely and effectively in selected patients. Even in the presence of extensive lesions, these techniques offer high technical success rates and favorable clinical outcomes.
Technical Challenges and Pre-procedural Planning
A primary technical challenge in the endovascular management of infrarenal aortic occlusion is the successful traversal of the occluded segment while maintaining true lumen access. Procedural success is optimized through the strategic use of:
Hydrophilic guidewires and angled catheters.
Adequate guide support and, where necessary, bidirectional (brachial and femoral) access (10).
Pre-procedural Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA): This is crucial for evaluating lesion length, calcification, proximity to the renal arteries, iliac involvement, and distal runoff—all of which dictate technical feasibility.
Advantages of Stent-Grafts
Stent-graft placement offers several mechanical advantages over balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stenting. Covered stents effectively exclude diseased arterial segments, reduce elastic recoil, and minimize plaque prolapse, thereby lowering the risk of restenosis. The COBEST trial demonstrated superior primary patency rates for covered stents compared to bare-metal stents in complex aortoiliac lesions, particularly TASC C and D (11). These findings support the routine use of covered stents and stent-grafts in extensive occlusive disease.
Clinical Outcomes and Limitations
Contemporary studies report high technical success rates for endovascular treatment of chronic aortic occlusion, frequently exceeding 90%, with favorable early and mid-term patency (12,13). In the present case, recanalization of the occluded infrarenal aorta followed by stent-graft placement resulted in the immediate restoration of antegrade flow and significant symptomatic relief, highlighting the effectiveness of this approach.
Despite these advantages, endovascular treatment has recognized limitations. Potential complications include:
Access-site complications.
Stent thrombosis or endoleak.
Furthermore, long-term durability remains a concern, as patency data beyond 5–10 years are limited compared to surgical bypass. Consequently, careful patient selection, precise device sizing, and rigorous post-procedural surveillance—combined with lifelong antiplatelet therapy—are essential for optimizing long-term outcomes (14).