K.E.M.

Radiology

Patients First


Welcome to the Academic and Educational pages  of the

Department of Radiology 

  Seth G.S. Medical College and K.E.M. Hospital, Mumbai , India

Case of the Month

< Case No. 36 : April 2023 >

Parosteal osteosarcoma of the Radius

Contributed by: Mit Patel

Clinical Profile:

A 27 year old woman came with the complaints of a gradually increasing painful swelling over the right elbow since one year. The lesion is hard , well circumscribed, immobile on the  the anterior and medial aspect of right elbow joint. There are areas of discoloration over the mass.

             Fig. 1 : On examination,  there is hard, well circumscribed, immobile mass on the  anterior and medial aspect of right elbow joint. There are areas of discoloration over the mass.

Radiological findings:

Plain radiograph:

Fig. 2 : The lateral view of the elbow shows a large soft tissue opacity extending from distal humerus to proximal forearm. It measures approximately 10x8cm. There is no calcification. There is lytic destruction of head of the radius. 

Sonography :

Fig. 3 : Axial sections of right forearm ultrasound examination show a large heterogenous, hypoechoic soft tissue lesion) in the right forearm, crossing the elbow joint in the subcutaneous plane with mild vascularity. There are multiple cystic spaces within the lesion. The underlying bony cortex is irregular. The ulnar and radial vessels are splayed with mild compression.

MRI :

Fig. 4 The T1 weighted coronal sections of right elbow show a well defined multilobulated lesion with fluid fluid level arising from defect in the medial aspect of proximal metadiaphyseal region of ulna. It measures 10.8x10.5x18.4cm. The lesion  extends into medullary cavity.

The T2 weighted coronal sections show few hypointense areas suggestive of hemorrhage.

The post contrast T2 weighted axial  section show heterogenous post contrast enhancement.

The T1 weighted fat suppressed coronal show area of altered intensity in distal humerus.

Radiological diagnosis:

Osteogenic sarcoma

Pathological diagnosis and treatment:

The patient underwent an incisional biopsy from the elbow swelling and also an sonography guided biopsy from an axillary deposit. 

Histology showed a periosteal osteosarcoma.

She was advised  forequarter amputation and was referred to a specialist cancer center.

Fig. 5 Histopathology of the mass show spindle cells between regularly arranged osseous trabeculae.

Timeline

Discussion

Osteosarcoma is a primary bone malignancy characterized by malignant cells of mesenchymal origin depositing immature osteoid matrix. It is one of the most common neoplasms of the musculoskeletal system, accounting for approximately one-fifth of all primary malignant bone tumours. (1)

Osteosarcoma encompasses various types of bony lesions, with the typical manifestation which is a high-grade sarcoma arise intramedullary. A few of the disease entities arise on the outer cortical surface; such lesions are termed surface osteosarcomas which are further divided into parosteal osteosarcoma, periosteal osteosarcoma, and high-grade surface osteosarcoma. Parosteal osteosarcoma represents the well-differentiated end of surface osteosarcoma, which typically consists of a slow-growing lesion that assumes a significantly better prognosis than conventional osteosarcoma. However, it rarely manifests as a dedifferentiated fashion, which is usually more abrupt and is associated with poorer prognosis. (1)

Parosteal osteosarcoma has slight female predominance and more frequently encountered in the third decade of life. Posterior aspect of distal femoral metaphysis is the most common site followed by proximal tibial and proximal humeral metaphysis. Those three locations combined account for more than 80% of all cases of parosteal osteosarcoma. The commonest presentation is pain and swelling. Systemic metastasis is rare in parosteal osteosarcomas. (1)

Histologically, parosteal osteosarcoma typically presents with irregular bony trabeculae and bland-appearing spindle cells within the fibrous stromal tissue. Markedly, atypical cells and atypical mitoses are not present. (1)

The diagnostic criteria to designate a surface osteosarcoma as parosteal osteosarcoma is that radiographically the lesion should have arisen from the surface of the bone, histologically, the tumor should be well differentiated (Grade 1 or 2); it should be characterized by well-formed osteoid within a spindle-cell stroma and medullary involvement if any should be <25% of the medullary cavity. (2)

Surface osteosarcomas can mimic benign conditions such as

osteochondroma and myositis ossificans. All clinicoradiologically doubtful lesion needs to be biopsied to confirm the diagnosis.

Cartilage cap of parosteal osteosarcoma, if present, lacks the columnar arrangement of cells and shows mild cellular atypia thus differentiating it from osteochondroma. (2)

Radiographically, it appears as a sessile, ossified, lobulated mass which attaches to the underlying bone via a broad pedicle but does not penetrate the cortex to involve the medulla. In addition, there was little or no periosteal new bone formation. A peculiar radiolucent cleft separates the majority of the ossified mass from the cortex of the femur. This cleft (1 to 3 mm in width) stops abruptly at the stalk of the tumor and has been referred to as the cleavage plane or string sign of parosteal sarcoma. This sign is present in only 30% of cases (3)

Surgery remains the treatment of choice. Wide excision with more than a 1-cm surgical margin is considered adequate, while incomplete excision almost inevitably leads to local recurrence.  In cases of marginal excision, a positive microscopic surgical margin warrants a second operation.  For recurrent disease, re-excision or amputation may provide a possible cure in cases that lack tumor dedifferentiation.  To achieve complete excision, a preoperative diagnosis and radiological evaluation of the extent of disease are required. When areas of dedifferentiation are suspected and proven by biopsy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve the clinical outcome. (4)

References:

1. Prabowo Y, Kamal AF, Kodrat E, Prasetyo M, Maruanaya S, Efar TS. Parosteal Osteosarcoma: A Benign-Looking Tumour, Amenable to a Variety of Surgical Reconstruction. Int J Surg Oncol. 2020 May 28;2020:4807612. doi: 10.1155/2020/4807612. PMID: 32550023; PMCID: PMC7275216.

2. Kumar VS, Barwar N, Khan SA. Surface osteosarcomas: Diagnosis, treatment and outcome. Indian J Orthop. 2014 May;48(3):255-61. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.132503. PMID: 24932030; PMCID: PMC4052023.

3. Yochum Rowe -Essentials of Skeletal Radiology-primary bone tumors page no. 1192.

4. Yogi Prabowo, Achmad Fauzi Kamal, Evelina Kodrat, Marcel Prasetyo, Samuel Maruanaya, Toto Suryo Efar, "Parosteal Osteosarcoma: A Benign-Looking Tumour, Amenable to a Variety of Surgical Reconstruction", International Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 2020, Article ID 4807612, 6 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4807612

Acknowledgement :

We are grateful to the Department of Pathology  at our institution for providing us with an image from the histological findings as also its description.